Review quality, not just response time

AI scores closed conversations and explains its result. Compare its findings with customer feedback and a human review to identify specific improvements.

A customer conversation in the Tygy workspace

For your team

An explained result

A reason accompanies the score for review.

Manager involvement

A reviewer adds their own score and comment.

Agent feedback

Feedback relates to a specific closed conversation.

What Tygy can do

After resolution

Start with the reason behind the score

After an eligible conversation closes, AI analyses the messages using the quality methodology. The score and explanation help your team choose cases to review.

  • Review a completed conversation rather than a single reply.
  • Read the explanation alongside the original conversation.
  • Keep in mind that not every conversation is eligible.
A customer conversation in the Tygy workspace
The original conversation helps you check the review findings.

Human review

Three perspectives give you more context

AI, the customer and a reviewer see the outcome from different perspectives. Compare available scores and leave the agent a comment with a specific example.

  • See customer feedback when a rating was submitted.
  • Add your own score and explanation.
  • The agent can acknowledge the feedback.
A customer conversation in the Tygy workspace
Each review relates to a specific conversation and its assignee.

Team standards

Define what a good answer means

Configure the quality methodology for your team’s work. Reviewer corrections provide examples for subsequent AI evaluations.

  • Make your expectations for replies explicit.
  • Review differences between AI and human scores.
  • Turn useful findings into team guidance.
The knowledge base article editor
Your knowledge base helps turn review findings into instructions.

Screenshots show the Tygy interface with demonstration data. Names, conversations and figures are examples.

How it works

From a closed conversation to an improvement

A score is useful when it leads to a clear action.

  1. Close

    The team closes the conversation.

  2. Evaluate

    AI analyses an eligible conversation.

  3. Review

    A reviewer compares the findings with the context.

  4. Discuss

    The agent receives specific feedback.

Configure the feature for your team and check the results against your own examples.

Everyday tools

Make quality review a routine

Methodology

Set criteria that match your support work.

Reviewer permissions

User permissions determine access to reviews.

Outcome context

Consider customer feedback and the AI explanation alongside the messages.

AI quality

Questions and answers

Does AI score each message?

No. A score applies to a closed conversation. Evaluation requires an eligible two-way exchange.

Can a reviewer disagree with AI?

Yes. A reviewer can add their own score and explanation, shown separately from the AI score.

Why might a score be missing?

The conversation may be ineligible, the feature may be disabled, or evaluation may still be processing. AI also needs an available token balance.

More AI capabilities

Start with a few real conversations

Compare AI and reviewer scores, refine your criteria and make reviews part of your team’s work.

14 days free · No credit card required